'Leonardo vs. Michelangelo\r'

'da Vinci versus Michelangelo Violet Jane Greeley fine cunningifice Appreciation ART 101 Carrie Ann Wills November 13, 2012 Da Vinci versus Michelangelo da Vinci da Vinci and Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Sim wholeness sh bed umteen similarities. Both were tonalityers, cutters, and poets. They both had a drift to leave their whole caboodle in polish off. Both mechanics speedily surpassed the givingss of their instructors and achieved fame with ease. In step-up, both dodgeists were kn suffer to run through al wizardtvas class by dissecting gentle cadavers [ (Bambach, 2002) ].Together they make up ii thirds of the spiritual rebirth’s deuce-ace enormousest esthetic minds of each(prenominal) generation, the an an any(prenominal) early(a)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) creative activity Raphael. In this paper, I pull up stakes number 1 accord a brief biography of sever eithery inventionist, then compare and contrast three getplaces of art by da Vinci with three locomoteings of art by Michelangelo, followed by a discussion on how each artist make their avouch per paroleal influence on the solid ground of art in Italy and Europe during the sixteenth century, and provide reinforcement examples. da Vinci was born(p) on April 15, 1452 and passed past on may 1, 1519 [ (Helicon, 2005) ].da Vinci’s starting signal word picture and sculpting instructor was Andrea del Verrocchio, with whom he was apprenticed to and level surpassed in skill [ (Vasari, 2006) ]. During his apprenticeship to Verrocchio, da Vinci excelled at umpteen skills including image, sculpting, architecture, engineering, and mathematics [ (Vasari, 2006) ]. Still further, he studied subjects much(prenominal) as botany, geology, geography, zoology, anatomy, hydraulics and chemical mechanism [ (Kleiner, 2010) ].Michelangelo was born on March 6, 1475 and passed away on February 18, 1565 [ (Jacobs, 1968) ]. When Michelangelo was quate rnteen days old, he was apprenticed to Do custodyico Ghirlandajo in April, 1488 [ (Vasari, 2006) ] [ (Gombrich, 1995) ]. Before long, Michelangelo excelled in his tasty ability, surpassed his fellow apprentices, and at clips charge rivaled his get across’s abilities [ (Vasari, 2006) ]. Additionally, he achieved exemplary skills in architecture, poetry, and engineering, unless was sound-nigh fond of sculpting above all else [ (Kleiner, 2010) ].Although Michelangelo wasn’t apparently influenced by Ghirlandajo in artistic order actings or styles, his attitude and bearing reflected that of his master more than full-gr bearly by his sponsor displays of vigorous persist ethics and an vehement temperament [ (Gombrich, 1995) ]. While under the guardianship of Ghirlandajo, Michelangelo carefully analyzed old and advanced artists and their proficiencys. These include but weren’t limited to Giotto, Masaccio, Donatello, Ghiberti, Benedetto da Majano, Mino da Fiesole, Antonio Rossellino and Jacopo della Quercia Rolland [ (Rolland, 1921) ].Florentines whose influence support be maken in Michelangelo’s whole shebang are Giotto and Masaccio [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. A yr aft(prenominal) his apprenticeship to Ghirlandajo, he was also introduced to Bertoldo di Giovanni (who was himself once a student of Donatello) through Lorenzo the Magnificent, and was instructed on the art of shape in the garden of Medici as comfortably as being influenced by Lorenzo de Medici [ (Kleiner, 2010) ] [ (Rolland, 1921) ].His buffer intent in join with Giovanni was to gain experience with the tradition of Donatello and to invoke his experience of antiquities, but the nigh peculiar asset Michelangelo acquired from Giovanni was access to and the friendship of the Medici family [ (Rolland, 1921) ]. From 1492 to 1494, Michelangelo obtained an great opportunity to study anatomy in the hospital which was adjoined to San Spirito [ (Nickerson, 2008) ] . Vasari stressed the importance of studying antique forms and the significance of much(prenominal) in the work of all of the most spicyly regarded master artists in the High rebirth era [ (Johnson, 2000) ].Leonardo, Raphael, and Michelangelo were no exceptions to this rule, and Michelangelo especially purpose himself in that aspect [ (Johnson, 2000) ]. Leonardo was a major(ip) contributor to the art population in the late 15th and archaean sixteenth centuries and a predecessor of umpteen opposite artistic marvels including Raphael and Michelangelo. Here I will discuss St. Jerome in the Wilderness, The conk Supper, and Mona Lisa. St. Jerome in the Wilderness was begun in 1480 and is one of many of Leonardo’s scanty products [ (Classics, 2012) ]. St.Jerome re ramps in the Vatican Museums in Rome [ (Classics, 2012) ]. St. Jerome withdrew from order into the Syrian Desert and became a withdrawn [ (Classics, 2012) ]. The video illustrates a faraway come to crucifix on the right status of the picture and St. Jerome kneeling down all the while fixing his eyes on the distant crucifix [ (Classics, 2012) ]. A quake can be seen in St. Jerome’s hand and a lion is crocked by [ (Classics, 2012) ]. The rock represents the object with which St. Jerome uses to v crest himself for the purposes of atonement [ (Classics, 2012) ].The lion is fact mood of the familiar St. Jerome acquired after healing an injury to the lions paw. A cardinal’s hat in concert with the lion and the stone are mutual traits associated with St. Jerome. Also on the right is a church among the rocks, the existence of which could indicate St. Jerome’s Doctoral position [ (Classics, 2012) ]. Leonardo utilize a fresh, bracing technique in positioning St. Jerome in a disproportionate way so that his find out was vastly different than that of the lion [ (Classics, 2012) ]. through the conversion of time, this moving-picture show has endured separation and the process of refabrication [ (Classics, 2012) ]. The Last Supper came into creation first in 1495, was improved upon in sporadic periods, and was undefiled it in its entirety in 1498 [ (Classics, 2012) ]. Duke Ludovico Sforza and Duchess Beatrice d’Este outfit The Last Supper who wanted it to be the center put together for the Sforza family mausoleum [ (Classics, 2012) ]. hitherto, the picture now serves as the wall coering for the dining residence in the monastery Santa Maria del Grazie [ (Classics, 2012) ].The Last Supper was an intricately detailed mission of deliveryman’ vitality as it neared its end in the evangel of John chapter 13 euphony 21. savior revealed his awareness of the upcoming treason from inwardly his beloved discipleship as the Bible draw the scene in the halt of Matthew chapter 26, euphony 21 [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. The re motions of the disciples ranged in varying degrees of outrage, shock, revulsion, grief, and suspicion as co ntinued in the disk of Matthew chapter 26, verse 22 [ (Kleiner, 2010) ].A nonher deferred payment to biblical doctrine include in the headstoneing was the initiation of the Eucharist in the book of Luke chapter 22, verses 19 through 20 [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. In the motion picture, Judas was clearly stunned at the announcement of his plot [ (Classics, 2012) ]. In a claim of reservation, he was grasping the money traveling bag containing the silver which had been obtained in trade for the betrayal [ (Classics, 2012) ]. Some observers of the painting argue that the base could also be suggestive of Judas’ crop as treasurer of the group as well [ (Classics, 2012) ].Close observers may take invoice of Judas tipping all over the salt shaker, which may be a cleverly disguised reference to a phrase which signifies the betrayal of a master [ (Classics, 2012) ]. scape appeared to be perturbed all the while wielding a knife; this could boast been a deliberate inclusion of th e painting in order to give observers a sense of foreboding, a reminder of the strength to come in the thick of messiah being arrested [ (Classics, 2012) ]. John was pied in a manner portraying him in the throes of a fainting spell [ (Classics, 2012) ].As was commonly technical at the time, Leonardo positioned all of the disciples and Jesus on one side of the hold over for the purpose of being able to see them all [ (Classics, 2012) ]. Some other painters during afterwards periods of time roleally separated Judas from the other disciples by either seating him on the opposing side of the table or by neglecting to give him a ringing like the others in the painting, an obvious recital of his fall from grace [ (Classics, 2012) ]. Rather than denoting Judas in that way, Leonardo uses the shadows as a gum elastic nursen for the villain to conceal his own guilt in [ (Classics, 2012) ].Jesus could be seen in the painting as he pointed toward the colewort and persisted in foretel ling pending events by stating that the traitor would break of the bread concurrently with himself as is suggested in the book of Luke chapter 22, verse 21 [ (Classics, 2012) ]. Judas reached for the bread as predicted because he was distracted by the conversation betwixt John and Peter [ (Classics, 2012) ]. In this painting, the artist used a definitive method of manipulating the easying which in turn by nature brought the observers eyes to the central focal point of the painting behind Jesus’ brainiac [ (Classics, 2012) ].Because Leonardo used an alternative method of painting, The Last Supper rapidly began deteriorating [ (Classics, 2012) ]. Although efforts have been made to maintain its integrity, the quality of the painting has suffered comfortably [ (Classics, 2012) ]. The deterioration so compromised the painting it can only be speculated upon that Leonardo in the graduation place intended for the positioning of Jesus’ feet to be suggestive of the forth coming crucifixion [ (Classics, 2012) ].It’s preferably apparent in this art piece that Leonardo did extensive enquiry with the help of models and close observational skills to shape a psychologically provocative and visually pleasing scene [ (Classics, 2012) ]. Mona Lisa otherwise cognize as La Gioconda was a characterization conceived in well-nigh 1503 and was end upd in 1519 [ (Classics, 2012) ]. The commissioning was initiated by the woman in the painting, Lisa del Gioconda and her husband who was a prosperous silk merchant in Florence [ (Classics, 2012) ].In the beginning of its existence, Mona Lisa may have been housed at Chateau Fontainebleau, but was then relocate to the Palace of Versailles, then to the Louvre where it carcass to this day [ (Classics, 2012) ]. No other work of art in the institution is more famous than Mona Lisa [ (Classics, 2012) ]. Lisa del Gioconda was a member of the Gherardini family, who were prominent Florentines [ (Classics, 2012) ] . The painting of this portrait was motivated by the acquisition of the couple’s freshly residence as well as in celebration of their second son having been born [ (Classics, 2012) ].Factors that aided in the advancement of this portrait gaining such colossal fame were the subdued facial expression, the delicate method of painting the shapes, and the enormity of the composition [ (Classics, 2012) ]. In creating the Mona Lisa, Leonardo used a pyramid shape as a basis of effort slightly positioning the subject into the space permitted, with her pass on folded demurely taking the shape of the obverse quoin [ (Classics, 2012) ]. The lighting of the portrait gently caressed her in various places including her breast, hands, neck, and subject, giving the painting added original dimensions [ (Classics, 2012) ].Lisa held an erect posture, and her fixed stare was other distinct feature that gave the portrait its pinch quality. The darker elements of the painting such as Lisa ’s hair and veil along with the cover shadows help to add radiance to her face that might otherwise have been less noticeable [ (Classics, 2012) ]. Leonardo’s absence of outlining limited facial features put upd the disembodied spirit of the subject. As was typical of Leonardo, the comprehensive landscape, the popular calmness, theatrical use of lighting and shadows, and the defile outlining all contributed to this masterpiece [ (Classics, 2012) ].It’s Copernican to note the background contained a visual illusion in that one side was strongly higher than the other which would be unfeasible in reality [ (Classics, 2012) ]. however because of the discrepancy, Lisa seemed to move or smile if the viewing audience eyes shifted from one side to the other [ (Classics, 2012) ]. The painting survived a number of attacks over a period of time including theft, an acidulated spill, stone throwing, and other such mishaps, but has been minimally damaged and on oc casion repaired [ (Classics, 2012) ].Michelangelo created many great works in his time, and in conjunction with Leonardo and Raphael delimitate the artistic era of the renascence. I will focus on two of his statues; The Pieta and David, and one of his paintings; The Last impression. Before discussing Michelangelo’s statues, I’d like to restate that he’d antecedently gained extensive acquaintance of human anatomy by on the Q.T. dissecting cadavers, which aided his ability to create entire portrayals of human physique while sculpting and painting [ (Hartt, 1989) ].Since this practice was illegal as well as being considered morally bollocks up behavior, having through so put him at an advantage over many other artists [ (Hartt, 1989) ]. Work on the Pieta, a big statue made of stain was set into dubiousness in between 1498 and 1499 and reached its fruition in 1500 [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. It was the French cardinal, Jean de Bilheres Lagraulas who commissioned the Pieta to be done so that it might enhance the behavior of the chapel in nonpareil Peters where he was intended to be interred [ (Kleiner, 2010) ].This statue, his first masterpiece was a representation of bloody shame holding Jesus after his crucifixion [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. Controversy surrounded this work of art regarding bloody shame’s appearance of being younger than Jesus [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. However the artist was able to portray Mary’s loveliness as well as her grief in an intensely vivid manner [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. The artist’s intent in portraying such youth in Mary was that he’d been attempting to use that feature as a method of defining Mary’s purity.As a result of the untested and tranquil appearance portrayed in the Pieta, Michelangelo’s statue was unique in comparison to other artists portrayals of the same scene in which their Mary was much older and broken-hearted. Michelangelo created such detailed imagery that the P ieta quite visibly displayed a variety of textures including hair, fabric, and flesh [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. This particular piece of artistry in addition to David has been duplicateted by numerous other painters and sculptors.It’s been said that Michelangelo wasn’t initially in the habit of signing any of his pieces of artistry. However, upon perceive observers crediting other artists with his accomplishment he began doing so with the Pieta. The Pieta originally was destined to occupy ideal Peter’s Basilica in Vatican City, however it is now located in the church which took the place of Saint Peter’s [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. Michelangelo’s David wasn’t the first statue of the biblical wizard, but it was the most dazzling one which has ever been created thus far [ (Kleiner, 2010) ].David was a popular biblical field of study about a young shepherd boy purportedly the underdog who volunteered to enter into skirmish with a much larger oppone nt [ (Lee, 2004) ]. In this story, David defeated his enemy with a trebuchet, his skill, and his courage as the only weapons at hand, without even being protected with armour [ (Lee, 2004) ]. Upon his return to Florence in 1501, Michelangelo received a warm reception regardless of his previous association with the Medici family [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. He began sculpting David immediately and completed this work in 1504 [ (Kleiner, 2010) ].Donatello and Verrocchio both had previously created statues of David; however unlike Michelangelo, theirs were symbolic of the hero after his battle with freak [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. Michelangelo created his embodiment of David to represent the events precedent to the battle with Goliath [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. He used David’s anatomy to imbue strength, anticipation, and reserved energy [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. He even added the minute detail of eat veins to emit a sense of the bodily process of an adrenaline rush and the headspring which accom panies it [ (Kleiner, 2010) ].David’s facial expression was indicative of having already decided to do battle, but not yet having completed the task. clear it was Michelangelo’s intent to portray David in the very moment in which the slingshot was about to be raised [ (Nickerson, 2008) ]. Michelangelo’s David possesses a poignant connection with an imperceptible presence [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. It was unlike any other because of its overall size and slender physique, and to this day can be surpassed only by Michelangelo’s Pieta.Upon apogee, this masterpiece further change integrity Michelangelo’s nature as a master sculptor and artist in all of Italy [ (Nickerson, 2008) ]. David is now located in Florence, and stands at an impressive fourteen feet high [ (Hartt, 1989) ]. Michelangelo’s knowledge of anatomy, balance, and proportion are prevalent, along with an aura of superhuman affluence [ (Hartt, 1989) ]. David is but one example of Miche langelo’s personality which exemplified divine humanity [ (Hartt, 1989) ]. nobleman humanity represented developing determine in the Renaissance era [ (Hartt, 1989) ].The Renaissance began a movement away from centuries of accommodate over human affairs on the part of the church and a comeback of humanistic values of the contemporary world [ (Hartt, 1989) ]. It was firmly held by Michelangelo that the human corporeal structure was the living embodiment of God’s divine power [ (Hartt, 1989) ]. He successfully articulated man in its last heroic status in creating his David sculpture [ (Lee, 2004) ]. The spiritual closeness Michelangelo held to was in contribute contrast with the scientific approach of Leonardo [ (Hartt, 1989) ].Michelangelo began painting The Last Judgment in 1536 and completed it in 1541 [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. In the midst of his work, the counter-reformation was in full force [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. An great issue affecting the world of art was the difference in religious beliefs between the Catholics and the Protestants [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. The Catholics valued artwork for its power to wangle the people toward piety [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. Protestants, on the other hand found artwork to move on idolatry and distraction [ (Kleiner, 2010) ].To alleviate competition regarding this issue, the Catholic Church reached an agreement that images should be visually and theologically unambiguous [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. The tumult of the counter-reformation was instrumental in Michelangelo’s last to paint the reredos of the Sistine chapel, The Last Judgment as a way of personation the controversial times. The central sign of the altarpiece was the passe-partout, and all around the Christ figure were nudes. God was the unyielding authority over his human subjects, and physically gestured his intent to abruptly annihilate humanity [ (Kleiner, 2010) ].It’s quite clear that the Lord had complete experience over the dest iny of all of the pot liquor around him. The Heavenly hosts emanated their unease, while angels trumpeted, and the Lord discerned between the just who ascended to Heaven and the curse who were thrown into the pits of Hell [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. Michelangelo further purveyed horror by including rising dead figures and demons provoking great suffering and agony upon the bedamn souls [ (Kleiner, 2010) ]. Other known figures which complement this masterpiece were Saint Bartholomew and who was either the good robber or St. Andrew [ (Kleiner, 2010) ].The works of da Vinci and Buonarroti significantly influenced the world of art in the sixteenth century in Italy and Europe in numerous ways. The two artists shared many similarities in genius and scope of knowledge; however it was their individual uniqueness that amplify their works to the status of masterpieces in their lifetimes and beyond. In 1476, Leonardo was permitted to paint an angel in Verrocchio’s Baptism of Christ, in which he strike his master with his bright display of talent [ (Jacobs, 1968) ]. By that point in time, he’d already been elected to be a painter into the painter’s guild [ (Jacobs, 1968) ].Other contemporaries alongside Leonardo under Verrocchio’s tutelage included such notable artists as Perugino and Lorenzo di Credi [ (Johnson, 2000) ]. By the year 1481, Leonardo’s talent was known all over Italy, and he was commissioned by the Saint Donato monastery to paint their altarpiece which is now known as The Adoration of the Kings [ (Jacobs, 1968) ]. However as was Leonardo’s tendency, he neglected to complete the altarpiece and sought employment with Ludovico Sforza, Duke of Milan [ (Jacobs, 1968) ]. His first work for the Duke was to create a statue of Ludovico’s father.Approximately in 1496, Leonardo began planning and painting his famous Last Supper located in the Santa Maria delle Grazie, which took about two years to complete [ (Jacobs, 1968) ]. Around the year 1500, he created the painting known as The engagement of Anghiari, and soon after embarked on his most famous work, Mona Lisa [ (Jacobs, 1968) ]. Francois I was among the first patrons to passionately support the coming of the Renaissance to France and commissioned Leonardo to work around the year 1516 along with other prominent figures such as Rosso Fiorentino [ (Johnson, 2000) ].Following this event, he then created two more paintings for the French viceroy in Milan, The Virgin of the Rocks, and Saint Anne with the Virgin and the babe Christ that ended up being his last masterpieces [ (Jacobs, 1968) ]. Almost two centuries later, another artist known as Diego Velazquez would use similar painting techniques to Leonardo in which he wasn’t as touch with every minute detail of a subjects being so much as capturing their characteristic impressions [ (Gombrich, 1995) ].Leonardo was also the mastermind of a device known as sfumato which was used by man y other artists who followed him even centuries later in order to pommel the problem of naturalism and perspective creating a rigid and wooden appearance on the subjects of the paintings [ (Gombrich, 1995) ]. Unfortunately, another problem arose which this technique could not accommodate. The shadows used by Leonardo didn’t naturally occur in the light of day, therefore Impressionist artists had to resort to blurring some aspects of their painting to prevail over the dilemma [ (Gombrich, 1995) ].Michelangelo learned the fresco technique from his original instructor, Ghirlandaio [ (Jacobs, 1968) ]. Later on, he was sent to the Medici Garden where he learned from Bertoldo di Giovanni [ (Jacobs, 1968) ]. While in the presence of the Medici family, Lorenzo de Medici encouraged Michelangelo to involve himself in conversations with many of the most renowned men of the time [ (Jacobs, 1968) ]. He achieved recognition for his talent in approximately 1492 when he constructed his fir st masterpiece The Battle of the Centaurs, which was a marble relief [ (Johnson, 2000) ].This statue remains un entire as are many of Michelangelo’s works of art. By 1499, Michelangelo succeeded in creating a superb statue known as Pieta, which was completed in 1499 and caused him to gain world-wide recognition [ (Jacobs, 1968) ]. In the adjoining few years, he occupied his time by creating a statue of David, in the Accademia, Florence [ (Jacobs, 1968) ] [ (Johnson, 2000) ]. Michelangelo’s depiction of David dwarfed those of Donatello and Verrocchio in ability, and talent. His next project, the tomb of pontiff Julius II was to be the protracted lasting one of his life, taking a full forty years to complete [ (Jacobs, 1968) ].One statue included in this great design is Moses, arguably the most excellent work exhibited by this particular sculptor [ (Johnson, 2000) ]. The tomb also includes The Atlas Slave (incomplete), The end Slave, and a statue of Lorenzo de Med ici, along with two supporting nudes below [ (Johnson, 2000) ]. In the midst of his work on the tomb of Pope Julius II, he worked on the Sistine chapel ceiling from may 10, 1508 until October 31, 1512, this also being done for Julius II [ (Rebman, 2000) ]. This particular masterpiece is to this day unrivalled to any other work of art [ (Rebman, 2000) ].Pope Julius II chose to employ Michelangelo for this task because his reputation throughout Italy and Europe was that of an outstanding sculptor who had an exceptional talent for using physical forms to express his own feelings and emotions [ (Rebman, 2000) ]. The ceiling of the Sistine Chapel in its entirety contains nine major panels; God Separating Light from Darkness, The Creation of the Sun, Moon, and Stars, The insulation of Land from Water, The Creation of Adam, The Creation of Eve, The temptation and Fall of Adam, The Sacrifice of Noah, The Flood, and the Drunkenness of Noah [ (Rebman, 2000) ].Twenty four years later, Mich elangelo was commissioned by Pope Paul III to paint a mural above the altar of the Sistine Chapel which was to be a companion piece to the ceiling; The Last Judgment [ (Jacobs, 1968) ]. This altarpiece took him six years to complete beginning in the summer of 1536 and reaching its completion on October 31, 1541 [ (Rebman, 2000) ]. According to records, Michelangelo employed a single assistant for this project; Urbino, a talented artist who showed a significant ability with the foreshortening technique [ (Rebman, 2000) ].Numerous authorities on the matter believe Michelangelo’s pedigree of inspiration for The Last Judgment was derived from a poem, The Divine Comedy written by Dante who mentioned a Charon and Minossis both of whom are included in the painting [ (Rebman, 2000) ]. Much cheering and criticism was heard for this painting, ranging from amazement and delight in to abhorrence for the scandalous bleakness [ (Rebman, 2000) ]. Biago da Cesena was one of the first amo ng many who offered critical disapproval of the nudity of the figures [ (Rebman, 2000) ].As a result, Michelangelo painted the face of Biago on the figure of daimon and a serpent slithering about the body while biting the rampart area of Satan [ (Rebman, 2000) ]. Despite Biago’s complaints to the Pope, the painting remained as it was [ (Rebman, 2000) ]. Unfortunately, due to so much criticism over the nudity of the painting, modifications were later made by Daniele da Volterra, who was hired by the church officials to paint clothing on the genitals of the nude figures [ (Rebman, 2000) ]. However, another artist, Martino Rota made an engraved replica of the original Last Judgment prior to the alterations [ (Rebman, 2000) ].Similar to the habits of Leonardo, Michelangelo frequently abandoned his paintings before completing them, and the only known finished easel painting is The Holy Family [ (Jacobs, 1968) ]. Michelangelo’s reputation was far superior to those of his contemporaries in sculpture, even including the next generation [ (Johnson, 2000) ]. Many new and upcoming artists studied Michelangelo’s methods with great intensity, and strived to imitate his level of distinction by painting nudes in their own works of art as he had done [ (Gombrich, 1995) ].These artists seemed to have overindulged themselves in this practice, and such behavior took away from the meaning of the paintings rather than adding to it [ (Gombrich, 1995) ]. This agency became known as Mannerism. In closing, I’ve mentioned a few similarities common between both Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simone. In addition, I gave a summary of each artists lives, compared a few of their art pieces, and finished off with a discussion on how each artist made their own personal influence on the world of art in Italy and Europe during the 16th century with supporting examples.References Bambach, C. (2002, October). Anatomy in the Renaissance. Retrieved from Heilbrunn Timeline of imposture History: http://www. metmuseum. org/toah/hd/anat/hd_anat. htm Classics, D. (2012). Masters of Art: Leonardo da Vinci. Delphi Classics. Gombrich, E. H. (1995). The Story of Art. Hong Kong: Phaidon invoke Limited. Hartt, F. (1989). Art: A History of Painting, Sculpture, architecture 3rd edition. clean York: Harry N. Abrams. Helicon, P. (2005). The Hutchinson encyclopaedia of the Renaissance. Abingdon , Oxfordshire, GBR: Helicon Publishing. Retrieved Nov 4, 2012, from http://site. brary. com/lib/ashford/docDetail. action Jacobs, D. (1968). Master Painters of the Renaissance. newfangled York: The Viking Press, Inc. Johnson, P. (2000). The Renaissance: A Short History. New York: Random House Inc. Kleiner, F. S. (2010). Gardners Art Through the Ages: The Western Perspective. United States: Clark Baxter. Lee, S. (2004, Sep 2). act 500: The Meaning of Michelangelos ‘David: Final Edition. Retrieved from Proquest: http://search. proq uest. com/docview/357580072? accountid=32521 Nickerson, A. (2008). move around into Michelangelos Rome.Birkley, California, United States: Roaring Forties Press. Retrieved Nov 4, 2012, from http://site. ebrary. com/lib/ashford/docDetail. action? docID=10289907;p00=paintings%20michelangelo Rebman, R. C. (2000). The Sistine Chapel. San Diego, California: Lucent Books, Inc. Rolland, R. (1921). Michelangelo. New York: Duffield and Company. Vasari, G. (2006, Feb). Lives of the some Excellent Painters, Sculptors, and Architects. Retrieved from ebrary. com: http://site. ebrary. com/lib/ashford/docDetail. action? docID=10124952;p00=lives%20excellent%20painters%2C%20sculptors%2C%20architects\r\n'