Law and Conflicting Perspectives Essay

Composers represent conflicting perspectives by their own unique experiences and values as their political and social contexts. Geoffrey Robertsons self styled memoir The Justice naughty written in the late 1900s heavily reflects these conflicting perspectives in the Trials of Oz and The Romans in Britain through the employwork forcet of emotive and persuasive language and ridicule in the form of satire to which convey Robertsons sensible horizon through his eyes.Such conflicts also portrayed in Charles Waterstreets article Its a long fickle road to justice which equal to Robertsons use of persuasive techniques utilizes satire to challenge and question the myopic procedures of the intelligent organization. As society develops, along with it come the changes in values and beliefs this is straightforward in The Trials of Oz which displays the differing attitudes and conflicting perspectives between generation gaps.The Trials of Ozs Rupert Bear was wholeness of great offence in Robertsons time, whereas today material similar to this is everywhere and is mostly socially acceptable which parallely reflect the beliefs of freedom of destination and individuality growing within society.Robertson himself believed these values which is evident in his view put across in a metaphor for describing the legal system as the justice game revealing the lack of freedom of linguistic communication and individuality acknowledgement within it, which is reinforced through the chapter through repetition, arising questions for the responder. In the Trials Of Oz, Robertson uses persuasive language to describe the defendants as honest young men and to characterise Oz as a harmless coffee-table magazine for the revolution that would neer happen.